An Encyclopedia and Go to Source for All Things UAP

UAP Personalities

  • Targ, Russell
    • Physicist and parapsychology researcher who co-developed “remote viewing” at SRI.
    • A major crossover figure between psi research and intelligence-lore adjacent to UFO culture.
    • Criticized for methodological weaknesses and the pseudoscience label applied to remote viewing claims.
  • Tart, Charles
    • Psychologist/parapsychologist known for altered-states and psi research; a key “consciousness” crossover figure.
    • Influential in how UFO-adjacent circles interpret anomalous experience (consensus trance, altered perception).
    • Often criticized by skeptics for endorsing paranormal interpretations; influential in transpersonal psychology discourse.
  • Taylor, Travis S.
    • Scientist/engineer and TV personality associated with The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch.
    • Publicly framed anomalous ranch events as potentially scientific unknowns worth investigation.
    • Also authored popular nonfiction that blends motivational “law of attraction” claims with a science veneer.
  • Temple, Robert K. G.
    • Author of The Sirius Mystery, arguing Dogon lore reflects extraterrestrial contact claims.
    • A major figure in “ancient astronauts” pseudoarchaeology through Sirius/Dogon narratives.
    • Widely criticized for speculative leaps and contested ethnographic interpretations.
  • Teodorani, Massimo
    • Italian astrophysicist known in anomaly research circles for work on the Hessdalen lights.
    • Approached luminous-atmospheric anomalies with instrumentation and field observation.
    • A contested figure in “scientific anomaly” discourse due to clashes with skeptical and Wikipedia-edit cultures.
  • Thomas, Andy
    • UK “mysteries and histories” author/lecturer covering UFOs, cover-ups, and crop circles.
    • Known for a “balanced but open” brand positioned between skeptics and believers.
    • Authored overview-style conspiracy/UFO books used as gateway reading.
  • Thomas, Chan
    • Author tied to The Adam and Eve Story, a catastrophic “cycle” narrative often circulated in conspiracy/UFO-adjacent circles.
    • A persistent motif in “suppressed knowledge” lore due to declassified government-library copies.
    • Frequently invoked in pole-shift / cataclysm / hidden-history discussions more than classic UFO casework.
  • Thomas, Gordon
    • Investigative journalist/author best known for intelligence-related books; occasionally referenced in UFO-adjacent “secrecy” culture.
    • Not a core ufologist, but often overlaps thematically with cover-up narratives.
    • Influence mostly via the broader “secret intelligence world” literature.
  • Thomas, Kenn
    • Conspiracy writer and publisher of Steamshovel Press; covered UFO history and parapolitics themes.
    • Authored works connecting UFO lore to broader deep-politics and intelligence narratives.
    • Influential as an archivist/editor shaping what “counts” as the parapolitical UFO canon.
  • Thompson, Keith
    • Author of Angels and Aliens linking UFO narratives to mythic imagination frameworks.
    • Positions UFO belief as a modern myth-form with cultural and psychological roots.
    • Represents a literary-cultural lens rather than strict case-investigation ufology.
  • Tibando, Terry
    • Author of the multi-volume series A Citizen’s Disclosure on UFOs and ETI.
    • Frames UFO evidence as a curated “citizen archive” of photos, documents, and interpretive history.
    • Represents a self-published, compendium-driven approach rather than institutional ufology.
  • Tingley, Brett
    • Defense/UAP journalist known for reporting on Navy “UFO patent” and UAP policy/report developments.
    • Acts as a media bridge between official documents and public UAP narratives.
    • Not a “ufologist” investigator so much as a modern UAP news interpreter.
  • Tompkins, William
    • Memoir-style author in “secret space program” lore claiming insider access to classified aerospace and alien narratives.
    • Best known for the Selected by Extraterrestrials series sold as personal testimony.
    • Highly controversial: treated by supporters as whistleblowing, by critics as unverifiable storytelling.
  • Trench, Brinsley
    • Aristocratic UFO/ancient-ET writer tied to “Hollow Earth,” ancient aliens, and secret-history claims.
    • Authored multiple books arguing extraterrestrials shaped human origins and religion.
    • Associated with sensational claims such as alleged Eisenhower–alien contact stories.
  • Truzzi, Marcello
    • Sociologist who investigated paranormal claims and co-founded CSICOP, later critiquing “pseudoskepticism.”
    • A major influence on how UFO/paranormal claims are debated (burden of proof, standards of evidence).
    • Often cited for framing skepticism as a method—not just debunking.
  • Tsoukalos, Giorgio A.
    • Iconic TV face of the “ancient astronauts” idea via Ancient Aliens.
    • Popularized the claim that many ancient myths/monuments reflect extraterrestrial intervention.
    • A lightning rod for criticism over speculative, non-falsifiable interpretations of history.
  • Turner, Karla
    • Abduction-focused author whose books framed alien encounters as manipulative and traumatic.
    • Helped define a “dark abduction agenda” strand distinct from benevolent-contact narratives.
    • Highly influential among experiencer communities; heavily disputed by skeptics and alternative-abduction theorists.
  • Twining, Nathan F.
    • U.S. Air Force general historically tied to early “flying discs” internal assessment via the “Twining memo” lore.
    • Not a ufologist by trade, but influential in the institutional origin story of modern UFO discourse.
    • Often cited in debates about early military seriousness toward UFO reports.
  • Tyson, Neil deGrasse
    • Mainstream astrophysicist and science communicator who frequently dismisses UFO claims absent strong evidence.
    • A prominent skeptical foil in UFO culture debates, often emphasizing data quality and reproducibility.
    • Influential because his commentary shapes mainstream audience expectations about what “counts” as proof.