An Encyclopedia and Go to Source for All Things UAP

UAP Groups

  • APEC (Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference)
    • Free, online community conference focused on warp drives, gravity-modification, and “UAP physics” framed as engineering problems.
    • Founded during the pandemic-era Zoom meetup wave and grew into a recurring webinar series with an associated community network.
    • Acts as a visibility engine for indie labs (e.g., Falcon Space) via regular “Lab Partners” research update segments.
    • Often criticized for blurring mainstream physics discussion with fringe claims and under-validated experimental narratives.
    • Florida Space Coast startup claiming a “propellantless propulsion” effect based on asymmetric electrostatic pressure.
    • Markets the “Exodus Effect” as producing measurable thrust, including in vacuum-chamber testing.
    • Promotes a patented architecture involving multi-electrode structures and non-uniform electric-field stress.
    • Frequently debated due to extraordinary claims, limited peer-reviewed publication, and measurement-artifact concerns.
    • New Jersey-based “advanced propulsion” lab brand that blends experimental R&D with UAP reverse-engineering narratives.
    • Known for stewardship and public analysis of a purported UAP material sample marketed as “Art’s Parts.”
    • Centers its technical storyline on Dynamic Nuclear Orientation / Dynamic Nuclear Polarization as a route to gravity-control or mass-reduction effects.
    • Acts as a recurring lab-partner presence in the Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference (APEC) ecosystem.
  • MIC
  • Sol Foundation
    • Nonprofit UAP institution launched in 2023 that frames “post-UAP” realities as a cross-domain problem—science, policy, law, culture, and security—seeking legitimacy through curated experts and formal outputs.
    • Built visibility via annual symposia and “white paper” style publications that treat UAP as a governance challenge, advocating disclosure pathways, reporting reforms, and evidence standards rather than tabloid UFO storytelling.
    • Controversial by design: praised for professionalizing UAP discourse with credentialed participants, criticized for mixing academic branding with extraordinary claims that remain difficult for the public to independently verify.
  • The Aviary
    • Alleged insider “bird-codename” network said to steer UFO narratives via selective leaks, ambiguity, and credibility laundering.
    • Frequently linked (by critics) to 1980s-era disinformation / “perception management” around the Bennewitz/Dulce mythology and related rumors.
    • Often tied (directly or indirectly) to MJ-12 era document lore, “insider briefings,” and media-friendly talking points that shaped modern UFO culture.
    • Remains disputed: supporters frame it as informal discussion among security/science figures; critics frame it as an influence operation targeting ufology.
  • DeLonge, Tom
    To The Stars Academy (TTSA)
    • Hybrid “UAP disclosure” company blending entertainment, advocacy, and claimed science/aerospace ambitions.
    • Popularized modern Navy UAP narratives through high-profile ex-official spokespeople and TV programming.
    • Raised funds from the public, promising a multi-division pipeline: media storytelling + technical R&D posture.
    • Remains polarizing: praised for mainstreaming UAP, criticized over evidence standards and deliverables.

me@robertfrancisjr.com
Copyright 2026